Chapter-05:
Barriers in Effective Communication /Communication fall off
Sl. No.
|
Contentents
|
page #
|
5.1
|
Introduction
|
|
5.2
|
Barriers to Effective Communication |
|
5.3
|
Barriers and Gateways of Communication
|
|
5.4
|
Organizational Barriers
|
|
5.5
|
Building Rapport with Eye Contact
|
|
5.6
|
What habits would you like to break while
presenting?
|
|
5.7
|
Discussion questions
|
|
5.1 INTRODUCTION
People
in the world are not exactly alike. Cultures or countries are not the same.
These differences, however, can cause problems in conveying your meanings. Each
person’s mind is different from others. As a result, message sender’s meanings
and the receiver’s response are affected by many factors, such as individual:
a.
Semantic
barriers(Convention of meaning)
b.
Physical
Barriers
c.
Psychological
barriers
·
Emotional
barriers
·
Perceptual
barriers
d.
Barriers
involving values attitudes etc.
i)
Semantic Barriers
A basic principle of communication is that
the symbols the sender uses to communicate messages must have the same meaning
in both the sender’s and receiver’s minds. You can never be sure that the
message in your mind will be clearly sent to your receiver. The world is full
with errors, as a result of differences in semantic (meaning) understanding.
A symbol is a sign for something that exits in reality. Thus your name
really a symbol or word represents you. Only through common experience in a
connection made between the symbol or word attached to you and the person you
are in reality .Anyone with less common experience will not easily relate the
symbol (your name) with you. Besides, there are problems in convention of
meaning, so you must make yourself familiar with different types of meaning.
Denotation
A
denotation is usually the dictionary definition of a word. Denotative meanings
name objects, people or events without indicating positive or negative
qualities. Such words as car, desk, book, house, and water convey denotative
meanings. The receiver has a similar understanding of the thing in which the
word is used.
Connotation
A
connotation is an implication of a word or a suggestion separate from the usual
definition. Some words have connotative meanings, that is, qualitative judgment
and personal reactions. The word man is denotative, father, prophet, brother are
connotative. Some words have positive connotations in some contexts and
negative meanings in others. For example, slim girl and slim chances.
ii)
Physical Barriers
Communication
does not consist of words alone. Another set of barriers is caused by your own
physical appearance, your audience, or the context of the document or the
presentation. Your ideas, however good and however skillfully imparted, are at
the mercy of various potential physical barriers.
For
Writing
There
is a whole barrage of possible physical blocks, jammed or jagged margins,
fingerprints or smudges, unclear photocopies, unreadable word processor
printout, water or coffee, tea spots etc
For
Speaking
Mumbling,
not enunciating, speaking too quickly, noises become of hissing ventilation,
blowing air conditioning, ringing telephones, slamming doors etc. are different
aspects of physical barriers.
iii)
Psychological Barriers
Because
of the changing world, everyone has his own concept of reality. Also, human
beings, sensory perceptions – touch, sight, hearing, smell, and taste are
limited, and each person’s mental filter is unique. In our daily interaction
with others, we make various abstractions, inferences and evaluations of the
world around us.
·
Emotional Barriers
One
possible psychological block is emotional, you may be emotionally block is you
are announcing a new policy that whether you may become popular or unpopular.
Similarly, you may have emotional barrier while making your first presentation
or writing someone you dislike.
·
Perception barriers
The
perceptual problem is that people think differently so as a result their
perception of reality is different. The material world provides a special
reality to teach individual. As human being’s sensory perceptions—touch, sight
hearing, smell, taste -- are similar, and each person’s mental filter is
unique. We make various abstractions, inferences and evaluations of the world
around us.
Abstracting
Selecting
some details and omitting others is a process called abstracting. On many
occasions abstracting is necessary. Differences in abstracting take place not
only when persons describe events but also when they describe people and
objects. However, you should be cautious about “slanted” statements.
Slanting
is unfair in factual reporting. When presenting some particular facts, you
include your own biased ideas into it, you make slanting statement. Try not to
let personal preferences affect your factual reporting of information.
Inferring
Conclusions
made by reasoning from evidence are called inferences. We make assumptions and
draw conclusions even though we are not able to immediately verify the
evidence. Some inferences are both necessary and desirable; others are risky,
even dangerous.
Necessary
Inferences
When
we reach a foreign country, we are sure that we will be treated politely.
When
we post a letter, we infer that it will reach its destination.
When
we base our inferences on direct observation or on reasonable evidence, they
are likely to be quite dependable. Conclusion we make about things we have not
observed directly can often be untrue.
As
an intelligent communicator, we must realize that inferences may be incorrect
or unreliable and anticipate the risks before acting on them. Be careful to
distinguish clearly among verifiable facts, and mere guess work.
Barriers
Involving Values, Attitudes etc.
Both personality and attitude are complex
cognitive process. The difference is that personality usually is thought of as
the whole person whereas attitude may make-up the personality. The term
attitude describes people and explains their behavior. More precisely an
attitude can be defined as a persistent tendency to feel and behave in a
particular way towards some object. For example: Naeem does not like night
shift, so his attitude is negative towards his work assignment.
A receiver’s attitude towards a message can
determine whether it is accepted or rejected. The effectiveness is influenced
also by the values, attitudes, and opinions of the communicators. People react
favorably when they receive agreeable message. Receivers’ views of the
information will affect their response. This response could be what the sender
desires or just the opposite. Occasionally people react according
to their attitudes toward a situation rather than to the facts.
Closed Mind
Some
people hold rigid views on certain subjects. They maintain their rigid views
regardless of the circumstances. Such a closed minded person is very difficult
to communicate to.
Sender’s credibility
Credibility in the
sender is important in getting a favorable reaction. Often people react more
according to their attitude towards the source of information that to the
information itself. An effective communication builds credibility by writing and
speaking in a fair and just manner and by considering receiver’s point of view.
Other circumstances, such as environmental stresses, personal problems, and
sensitivity affect attitudes, opinions and responses.
5.2 Barriers to Effective Communication
Various attitudes and beliefs can interfere
with effective communication in the classroom.
As a presenter of information, it is important to consider what barriers
you may carry into the classroom in order to overcome your fears. Following is a list of the most common:
ü “I’m so nervous, I
can’t even talk!” The main enemy of a
presenter is tension, which ruins the voice, posture, and oftentimes your
spontaneity. The voice becomes higher as
the throat tenses. Shoulders tighten up
and the legs start to shake causing unsteadiness. As a presenter, try not to fight nerves, but
welcome them instead! Actors recognize
the value of nerves . . . they can add to the value of a performance as
adrenaline starts to kick in. Another
strategy for overcoming nerves involves performing relaxation exercises or
taking deep breaths before you present as a way to reduce tension.
ü “I’m not good at
public speaking” When
asked to prioritize common fears, the fear of public speaking is often listed
before the fear of death, loneliness, and flying. Usually fears about speaking are related to
past experiences, unrealistic expectations, and your own self-concept. Fear inhibits communication.
ü “I must be perfect” Perfectionism
severely inhibits communication. Your
goal is to develop a good presentation, not a perfect presentation. It is unrealistic to know or remember
everything about a topic. Instead,
concentrate on developing techniques for remembering main topics, managing
memory lapses, and recovering from verbal blunders.
ü “I instruct, you
listen” Communication
is a two-way street. You are dealing
with thinking individuals, not sponges.
Student response is necessary to determine if the transmission of ideas
has occurred. Presenters also draw
energy and ideas from learner interaction.
ü “That’s just the way
I am” True
communication involves constant adaptation of presentation style, material, and
questioning techniques. Because the mix
of students in a class constantly changes, trying to use a set presentation
style is not acceptable. Flexibility,
reality checking, and the desire to change are necessary to improve your
communication style.
ü Other barriers?
Do you use any of these barriers in your
communication?
5.3 Barriers and Gateways of Communication
The success of a manager depends on how
clear he is in his mind about his basic functions and how effectively he can
transfer this clarity of thought to others. This involves a skill of helping
others to understand the manager and to be understood by him. Thus, the need
for better mutual understanding between labor and management in industry cannot
be over-emphasized. It is, in fact, a prerequisite of congenial climate
necessary for the overall advancement and productivity. The importance of
communication in management for getting the work done may also be seen from the
estimate of time which is spent by a manager in communication - verbal or
written, in conferences or meetings, giving directions or receiving
information. Most of the managers spend more than 60% of their time in
communication with others.
Barriers in Communication: The various
inadequacies that can be identified through communication evaluation are
required to be analyzed in terms of various factors - obstructions and barriers
- that impede flow communication. Any managerial action in this regard can be
effective only when it strikes at the very root of the factors that lie at the
very root of the problem. From this viewpoint, identification of different
factors is necessary.
There might be a
number of such barriers impeding the flow of communication in the organization.
These may be classified as: (i) external (ii) organizational, and (iii)
personal factors. However, such a classification does not suggest that these
are mutually exclusive. Rather, such a classification is helpful in
understanding the nature of communication barriers.
External
Barriers
Barriers to communication
may be either external to the parties involved or they might be internal to
them. External barriers may affect communication in any context, whether
organizational or otherwise. Such external barriers may be in the following forms:
1.
Semantic Barriers:
Semantic barriers are obstructions
causes in the process of receiving or understanding of the message during the
process on encoding and decoding ideas and words. These barriers arise from the
linguistic capacity of the parties involved. Words are the principal
communication instrument but a common difficulty with the words is that each
word has several meanings. For example, in English language, the word 'round'
has seventy five meanings. The Oxford Dictionary records an average of
twenty-eight separate meanings for each of the 500 most used words in the
English language. Similar is the position in other languages. Thus, words
sometimes fail to convey real meanings. Moreover, they work as barriers in
communication in the following manner.
(i)
Badly Expressed Message: Lack of clarity and precision in a
message makes it badly expressed. Poorly chosen and empty words and phrases,
careless omission, lack of coherence, bad organization of ideas, awkward
sentence structure, inadequate vocabulary, platitudes, numbering repetition
jargon, failure to clarify implications are some common faults found in this
case.
(ii) Faulty
Translations: Every
manager receives various types of communications from superiors, peers,
subordinates and he must translate information destined for subordinates, peers
and superiors into language suitable to each. Hence the message has to be put
into words appropriate to the framework in which the receiver operates, or it
must be accompanied by an interpretation, which will be understood by the
receiver. This needs a high level of linguistic capacity.
Approximate understanding of words and the consequent faulty
translations lead to impaired efficiency and heavy costs.
(iii)
Unclarified Assumptions: There are certain un-communicated
assumptions, which underlie practically all messages. Though a message appears
to be specific, it underlying assumptions may not be clear to the receiver.
(iv)
Specialist's Language: It is often found that technical personal
and special groups tend to develop a special, peculiar and technical language
of their own. This increases their isolation from others and builds a
communication barrier. Whatever be the intention of this special language, it
hinders their communication with persons not in their specialty, because of the
receiver's ignorance of that type of language.
2.
Emotional or Psychological Barriers: Emotional or psychological
factors are the prime barriers in inter-personnel communication. The meaning
ascribed to a message depends upon the emotional or psychological status of
both the parties involved. In a communication, apart from the message, there is
a meta-message, that is, what one gets out of a message when decoding.
Meta-message, the emotions of the receiver play a vital role and he may not be
at a wavelength as that of the communicator. Keith Davis opines that these
"exist in the people's minds or because of their actions, such as being
hard to contact or difficult to understand. These barriers to communication are
just at effective as an actual physical wall. Often these human barriers are
more like filter paper then a brick wall. They let through some communications,
but hold back others, thereby making communication inadequate….This 'half-way'
communication gets 'half-way' results". Following are some emotional
barriers:
(i)
Premature Evaluation: Rogers and Roethlisberger in 1952, first pointed out this
barrier. Premature evaluation is the tendency of prematurely evaluating
communications, rather than to keep an un-
compromised
position during the interchange. Such evaluation stops the transfer of
information and begets in the sender a sense of futility. This barrier can be
remedied by 'empathy', non-evaluative listening, where the communication is listened
to in a non-committal and unprejudiced way, so that sagacious decision and
action can follow.
(ii) Inattention: The
preoccupied mind of a receiver and the resultant non-listening is one of the
major chronic psychological barriers. It is a common phenomenon that people
simply fail to react to bulletins, notices, minutes and reports.
(iii) Loss by Transmission
and Poor Retention: When communication passes through various levels in the
organization, successive transmissions of the same message are decreasingly
accurate. It is said that in case of oral communications about 30 percent of
the information is lost in each transmission. Even in case of written
communication, loss of meaning might occur as far as the appended
interpretation, if any, is concerned. Poor retention of the information is
again a malady. It is shown that employees retain about 50 percent of
information only, whereas supervisors retain about 60 percent of it.
(iv) Undue Reliance on the
Written Word: Written word is no substitute for sound face-to-face
relationships and that employees cannot be persuaded to accept companies'
viewpoint and policies through 'slick', easy to read, will-illustrated
publications, unless there is a fair degree of mutual trust and confidence
between the organization and its employees. Further, a written communication
might fail to explain the purpose of order, procedure or directive. Chester
Barnard has laid down that a communication must appeal to the receiver as
consonant with the organization's purpose and with his own personal interest.
Written communication often tells what is to be done, but not why it should be
done, and it lacks the persuasive quality. Moreover, a written communication
can be above the level of readership, and failure to ascertain the response to
communication is also there.
Hence
written media must be considered as supplementary to productive face-to-face
relationships.
(v) Distrust of
Communicator: It arises out of ill-considered judgments or illogical
decisions or frequent countermanding of the original communication by the
communicator. Repeated experience of this kind gradually conditions the
receiver to delay action or act unenthusiastically, hence making the
communication unsuccessful, though apparently it is complete.
(vi) Failure to
Communicate: It is quite accepted fact that managers often fail to
transmit the needed messages. This might be because of laziness on the part of
the communicator, or assuming that 'everybody knows', or procrastination or
'hogging' information or deliberately to embarrass.
5.4 Organizational
Barriers
An
organization being a deliberate creation for the attainment of certain
specified objectives, day-to-day happenings within it required being regulated
in such a manner that they contribute to attain these objectives in the most
efficient manner. This is usually attempted through a variety of official
measures such as designing the organizational arrangements for performance of
various activities, prescribing of various policies, rules, regulations and
procedures, laying down of norms of behavior, instituting a
reward-and-punishment system, etc. All the inner processes, including
communication in different directions, are markedly affected by these
prescriptions. As such major organizational barriers may be as follows:
(i)
Organizational Policy: The general organizational policy
regarding communication acts as an overall guideline to everyone in the
organization regarding how he is normally expected to behave in this matter.
The policy might be in the form of explicit declaration in writing, or as is
very commonly the case, it has to be interpreted from the behavior of
organization members, particularly people at the top.
If this policy is not supportive to the flow of communication
in different directions, communication flow would not be smooth and adequate.
(ii)
Organizational Rules and Regulations: Organizational rules and
regulations affect the flow of communication by prescribing the subject-matter
to the communicated and also the channel through which these are to be
communicated. The rules may restrict the flow of certain messages and may leave
many important ones. On the other hand, communication through proper channel in
a specified way prescribed by these rules delays it and works against the
willingness of persons to convey the message. This barrier is strongly
operative in Indian public sector enterprises where observance of rules and
regulations is more rigid.
(iii)
Status Relationships: The placing of people in superior subordinate capacity in the
formal organization structure also blocks the flow of communication and more
particularly in upward direction. Greater the difference between hierarchical
positions in terms of their status, greater would be the possibility of
communication breakdown.
(iv)
Complexity in Organization Structure: In an organization where
there are a number of managerial levels, communication gets delayed, chances of
communication getting distorted are more and the number of filtering points are
more. This is more true in case of upward communication, because people
generally do not like to pass up the adverse criticism either or themselves or
of their superiors.
(v)
Organizational Facilities: Organizational facilities provided for
smooth, adequate, clear and timely flow of communication may take a number of
forms. Some of these have been mentioned earlier in the communication media
such as meetings, conferences, complaint box, suggestion box, open door system,
social and cultural gatherings, etc. If these are not properly emphasized
generally people fail to make effective communication.
Personal
Barriers
While
the organizational factors discussed above are, no doubt, important influences
operating on communication, a host of factors internal to the two
parties-sender and receiver-to this process also exert important influences on
its operation, as communication is basically an inter-personal process. Here,
for the sake of convenience in the analysis, these barriers have been analyzed
separately and these are relevant in the case of downward and upward
communication.
Barriers
in Superiors
The
role of superiors in communication is very vital. Because of their hierarchical
relationships with subordinates, they act as barriers in a number of ways
discussed below:
(i)
Attitude of Superiors: The attitudes of superiors towards
communication in general or in any particular direction affect the flow of
messages in different directions. For example, if this attitude in unfavorable,
there is a greater possibility that messages would not flow adequately from and
/ or to superiors.
(ii)
Pear of Challenge to Authority: A person in the
organization always tries to get a higher position and prestige to satisfy his
needs. As such, managers in general try to withhold the information coming down
the line or going up as frequent passing of information may disclose their
weakness.
(iii)
Insistence on Proper Channel: One of the basic features
of superiors exercising of the authority is that they wish to remain in
communication links and they do not like any type of bypassing in
communication. Communication through bypassing may, sometimes, be necessary but
superiors treat this as the warting of their authority and blocks the flow of
communication.
(iv) Lack of Confidence in Subordinates: Superiors
generally perceive, correct or otherwise, that their subordinates are less
competent and capable, they are not able to advise superiors or they may not
have some information coming downwards.
(v)
Ignoring Communication: Sometimes superiors consciously and
deliberately ignore the communication from their subordinates to maintain their
importance. This works against the willingness of subordinates to communicate.
(vi)
Lack of Time: Superiors feel, whether correct or otherwise, that they are
overburdened with the work and they have time to talk to their subordinates.
(vii)
Lack of Awareness: Sometimes, superiors may lack the awareness about the
significance and usefulness of communication in different directions in general
or of particular subject-matter. In such a case, communication flow is blocked.
Barriers
in Subordinates
Vertical
communication in either direction can take place only when subordinates also
actively participate in this process. There are various factors in the
subordinates that adversely affect such active participation on their part.
Some factors, which have been traced in the case of superiors, are also
applicable have such as attitude, time availability, awareness about the
significance, etc. Two factors are more important in the case of subordinates
and these are responsible for blocking communication in upward direction.
(i)
Unwillingness to Communicate: Sometimes, subordinates do
not communicate upwards certain information because they are not willing to do
so. Thus, if a subordinate feels that he is likely to be adversely affected by
a particular piece of information to his superior, he would not be willing to
supply it. Information going up is utilized for control purposes and
subordinates would not be willing to give any information to their superiors
about any unfavorable happening and
if its supplication is necessary
they would modify the information in such a way so as to protect their own
interest.
(ii)
Lack of Proper Incentive: Lack of motivation to communicate also
refrains subordinates to communicate upwards. The reward and punishment system
of the organization is more responsible for this. Thus, if a novel suggestion
by a subordinate does not evoke any attention from the organization, he would
not convey it.
Using Your Body Effectively
Effective communication involves more than
talking to your audience. Your body
language plays an important role in communication. Research shows that what you say accounts for
only 7% of the effectiveness of a presentation, while 93% is based on nonverbal
communication. Body language, proximity,
and eye contact are three main areas of focus in nonverbal communication. Remember it’s not what you say, but how you
say it that often matters the most in communication.
Some areas to consider while presenting include:
·
Facial Expressions: Smiling is a
powerful cue that transmits friendliness, warmth, and approachability. Smiling is often contagious and others will
react favorably. They will be more
comfortable around you and more open to the information you are offering.
·
Posture: You communicate numerous messages by the
way you hold yourself while presenting.
A person who is slouching or leaning with arms across their chest may be
perceived as being uninterested or unapproachable. Standing erect, facing the audience with an
open stance, and leaning forward communicates that you are receptive and
friendly. Speaking with your back turned
or looking at the floor or ceiling should be avoided as it communicates
disinterest.
·
Gestures: A lively speaking
style captures attention, makes the material more interesting, and facilitates
understanding. Use natural movements to
emphasize topics and free, easy arm and hand movements to add personality to
your presentation. If you fail to
gesture while speaking, you may be perceived as boring and stiff. Gesturing too often can also be distracting
for some learners.
·
Movement: Moving naturally around the classroom
increases interaction, adds interest, and draws attention to the
presentation. Staying frozen in the
front of the room can be distracting and boring for people to watch. Shuffling feet and pacing can convey
nervousness and lack of confidence.
·
Proximity: Cultural norms dictate a comfortable
distance for interaction with others.
When interacting with adults in the classroom, a presenter needs to be
aware of people’s defined levels of personal space. Signals of discomfort caused by invading
other’s space may include rocking, leg swinging, tapping, and gaze
aversion. Do not invade a student’s
intimate space. Most adults will feel
uncomfortable, even if rapport has been established.
5.5 Building Rapport with Eye Contact
Steady eye contact helps to regulate the
flow of communication, encourages participation, and can be used to develop
rapport with the audience. When students
feel that you see them as individuals, they are more likely to trust you as a
trainer and be more open to the learning experience.
Some tips for using eye contact to build
rapport include:
·
Length of Eye Contact: Try to maintain eye
contact with one person at a time for at least 3 – 5 seconds or until you
complete a thought. This helps to establish a connection with people and helps
you to avoid darting eyes, which can be distracting and communicate
nervousness.
·
Movement of Eyes: Direct eye contact towards different parts of
the audience throughout the course of your presentation. Staring too long in one direction may cause
you to miss important information and can make certain audience members feel
less important.
·
Search for Friendly Eyes: If you are nervous,
look for a friendly student and establish eye contact with that person. Gradually, work to establish eye contact with
everyone.
Some habits to avoid include:
·
Talking to the Ceiling: Don’t lecture to a
spot over the tops of the student’s heads.
They may think you don’t care or they may feel that you are “above
them.” Adults learn better with
colleagues.
·
Talking to the Board: Don’t lecture to
your desk, to the whiteboard, or to your visuals. Students may not be able to hear you and may
become disinterested.
·
Clutching Your Notes: Be familiar with
your material. Being tied to your notes
or a manual keeps you from establishing eye contact and may cause students to
question your knowledge, preparedness, and confidence.
5.6 What habits would you like to break
while presenting?
Enhancing Voice Quality
Voice is another area of communication that
can affect the quality of learning in a classroom. An interesting and audible voice will engage
students, while a soft or monotone voice can cause boredom or disinterest among
participants. While it may be difficult
to listen to and change our own voice, with awareness and practice, it is
possible to use one’s voice effectively.
The first step to refining your voice is to understand the components of
voice and identify common voice problems.
Once identified, most voice problems can be improved by being aware of
the problem, altering some habits, and practicing new behaviors on a regular
basis.
Voice Component |
Common Voice Problems and Suggestions for Improvement |
|
|
Pace
How long a sound lasts. Talking too fast causes words and syllables
to be short while talking slowly lengthens them. Varying pace helps to maintain the
audience’s interest.
|
Continuously talking too fast or too slow
·
Be
aware of your normal conversational pace and keep in mind how tension affects
the speed in which you talk.
·
Use
breathing and natural pauses to slow down your pace
·
Constantly
vary your pace in order to maintain audience interest.
|
Projection
The direction of the voice so that it can
be plainly heard at a distance.
Problems with projection are often the result of tension, breathiness,
and breathing from your throat.
|
Problems with
Projection
·
Avoid
projecting from your throat which can lead to sore throats, coughing, and
loss of your voice.
·
Take
slow, deep breaths, initiated from your abdomen
·
Open
your mouth fully and speak to the people in the back of the room.
|
Articulation
The ability to pronounce words
distinctly. It often reflects our
attitude towards the words we are speaking.
Clear enunciation reflects self-confidence and interest, while slurred
or mumbled speech indicate insecurity or indifference.
|
Sloppy Articulation
·
Speak
at a slower pace than your normal conversational tone.
·
Take
the time to pronounce each letter or sound within a word.
·
Listen
for common articulation problems, such as dropping the “g” at the end of
words such as finding or going.
|
PitchThe normal range of the voice – its highness or lowness. Think Pee Wee Herman for high and James Earl Jones for low. Everyone is capable of a wide voice range. Stress and poor breathing can greatly alter the pitch of your voice. |
Pitch Problems
·
Adjust
pitch to convey different meanings throughout a presentation.
·
To
alter pitch, control your breathing; breathe from your abdomen and slow your
rate of speech.
·
Take
pauses to relax between pitch changes
|
Inflection
The manner in which pitch varies as we
speak. Inflection serves as verbal
punctuation and involves changing pitch to convey meaning. Upward inflections ask a question, suggest uncertainty
or doubt, and communicate hesitancy.
Downward inflections give information and convey strength and
authority to the audience.
|
Inflection problems
·
Use
upward and downward inflections appropriately.
·
Avoid
constant middle inflection where the voice neither rises nor falls but just
drones on and on.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment