Basel II
Since the financial
crisis began in mid-2007, an important source of losses and of the build up of
leverage occurred in the trading book. A main contributing factor was that the
current capital framework for market risk, based on the 1996 Amendment to the
Capital Accord to incorporate market risks, does not capture some key risks. In
response, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the Committee)
supplements the current value-at-risk based trading book framework with an
incremental risk capital charge, which includes default risk as well as
migration risk, for unsecuritised credit products. For securitised products,
the capital charges of the banking book will apply with a limited exception for
certain so-called correlation trading activities, where banks may be allowed by
their supervisor to calculate a comprehensive risk capital charge subject to
strict qualitative minimum requirements as well as stress testing requirements.
These measures will reduce the incentive for regulatory arbitrage between the
banking and trading books.
Objectives
The FSI's
objectives are to:
- promote sound supervisory standards and practices globally, and to support full implementation of these standards in all countries.
- provide supervisors with the latest information on market products, practices and techniques to help them adapt to rapid innovations in the financial sector.
- help supervisors develop solutions to their multiple challenges by sharing experiences in seminars, discussion forums and conferences.
- assist supervisors in employing the practices and tools that will allow them to meet everyday demands and tackle more ambitious goals.
Main
activities The FSI achieves its
objectives through the following main activities:
- Events for financial sector supervisors such as conferences, high level meetings, and seminars held in Switzerland and globally
- FSI Connect, an online learning tool and information resource for financial sector supervisors
- Publications such as occasional papers and a quarterly newsletter
Pillar
1” of the new capital framework
revises the 1988 Accord’s guidelines by aligning the minimum capital
requirements more closely to each bank's actual risk of economic loss.Pillar
2 ” Supervisors will evaluate the activities and risk profiles of
individual banks to determine whether those organisations should hold higher
levels of capital than the minimum requirements in Pillar 1 would specify and
to see whether there is any need for remedial actions. Pillar 3”
leverages the ability of market discipline to motivate prudent
management by enhancing the degree of transparency in banks’ public reporting
to shareholders and customers.
The
Committee believes that, when marketplace participants have a sufficient
understanding of a bank’s activities and the controls it has in place to manage
its exposures, they are better able to distinguish between banking
organisations so that they can reward those that manage their risks prudently
and penalise those that do not.
Tier 1 and Tier 2 3
. Regulatory
Capital is Composed of:----T-1 or Core capital*.T-2 or Supplementary
Capital *T-3 or Additional Supplementary Capital
Tier 1 capital or ‘Core Capital’ elements:--*Paid up capital *Non-repayable share premium account *Statutory Reserve *General Reserve *Retained Earnings *Minority Interest in subsidiaries *Non-Cumulative irredeemable Preference Shares *Dividend Equalization Account
Tier 2 capital or ‘Supplementary Capital’ represents other elements which fall short of some of the characteristics of the Core capital but contribute to the overall strength of a bank:
a. General Provision
b. Revaluation Reserves -For fixed assets -For securities - For equity instruments
c. All other Preference Shares
d. Subordinated Debt
e. Exchange equalization AC
Tier 3 capital or ‘Additional Supplementary Capital’ consists of short-term subordinated debt (original/residual maturity less than or equal to five years but greater than or equal to two years) would be solely for the purpose of meeting a portion of capital requirements for market risk.
CONDITIONS FOR MAINTAINING REGULATORY CAPITAL
a. T-2 can not exceed T-1
b. 50% of fixed asset and security revaluation reserve shall be eligible for T-2
c. 10% of revaluation reserves for equity instruments eligible for T-2
d. Subordinated debt shall be limited to maximum 30% of T-1
e. A minimum of about 28.5% of market risk needs to be supported by T-1capital. Supporting of Market Risk from T-3 capital shall be limited up to maximum of 250% of a bank’s T-1 capital that is available after meeting credit risk capital requirement.
ELIGIBLE REGULATORY CAPITAL
a. Following Deductions are to be made from T-1:
o Book value of Goodwill and value of any contingent assets
o Provisioning shortfall against classified assets
o Provisioning shortfall against investment in shares
o Remaining deficit of revaluation in investment after netting off
o Reciprocal/crossholdings of banks capital/subordinated debt
o Additional/unauthorized amount of investment. (50% from T-1 and 50% from T-2)
o Investments in subsidiaries which are not consolidated. (50% from T-1 and 50% from T-2)
b. Eligible T-2 will be derived after deducting deductible components
c. Total eligible regulatory capital will be calculated by summing up the eligible T-1, T-2 and T-3
MINIMUM CAPITAL REQUIREMENT
a. No scheduled bank in Bangladesh shall commence and carryon business unless it has minimum paid up capital as fixed by BB.
b. Bank’s have to maintain minimum CAR on ‘Solo’ basis as well as on ‘Consolidated’ basis.
c. In order calculate MCR, banks are required to calculate their Risk Weighted Assets (RWA) on the basis of credit, market, and operational risks.
d. TRWA = RWA for CR + 10 (capital charges for market risk and operational risk)
e. CAR = With T-1 at least 5%
Non-deposit sources of Bank
In the world of banking practice, extensive development of receiving non-deposit sources of resource mobilization. The most common forms of such engagement means include:-1 Borrowing on the interbank market;2- An agreement to sell securities and repurchase (or operation “repo”);3- Consideration of bills and receipt of loans from central banks;4- Sale of bankers’ acceptances;-5 Issue of commercial paper;-6 Borrowing Eurodollar market;- 7Issue of capital notes and bonds..What are Common Deposit Funds?
Common
Deposit Funds (CDFs) are
deposit-taking schemes. Before the Charities Act 2006, they were open
only to charities in England and Wales, but are now also open to “appropriate
bodies” (i.e. bodies established as charitable under the law of Scotland or
Northern Ireland and eligible for UK tax relief) where the Scheme permits this.
They are set up by Schemes
made by the Charity Commission (the Commission) under section 25 of the Charities
Act 1993. They operate as deposit-takers and are deemed by law to be
charities themselves. They are therefore eligible for registration as charities
in their own right. CDFs provide a deposit-taking scheme which is tax
efficient, administratively simple and cost efficient. They enjoy the same tax
status as other charities.
Efficient fund mng
Efficient fund mng
general
principles for choosing bank assets and liabilities, for deciding on when to
make a loan and what interest rate to charge, for pricing funds transfer
services such as the handling of checks, for establishing compensating balance
requirements, and for dealing with government regulation. The discussion
assumes markets are efficient and deals first with an unregulated environment
and then with policies in the face of regulatory constraints. Most of the
policies which would be optimal in an unregulated environment will be optimal
in the regulated environment such as in the U.S. today, because it is
relatively easy to get around most of the regulations that are applied to banks
by the use of non-deposit liabilities, compensating balances and negative
checking accounts.
Banks
continue to face an uncertain regulatory and business environment as regulators
marshal their responses to the global financial crisis. Perhaps nowhere is this
uncertainty more keenly felt today than in the area of capital management.
Borrowing
in the interbank market. In
banking practice, the U.S.,
this market is known as the Federal Reserve. These funds represent the deposit
funds of commercial banks that are stored in the reserve account at the central
bank or federal reserve banks. Commercial banks with the reserve account
surplus compared with a mandatory minimum, provide them on loan for a short
time. This allows them to get extra profit and the bank-borrower to improve
liquidity.
60-s purchase of
federal funds used mainly to fund the reserve account of the bank, as interest
rates on them were below the discount rate the central bank. In subsequent
years, interest rates rose and began to exceed the discount rate.
Discounting bills
and obtaining loans from the central bank. This way of attracting additional
resources are used most often by commercial banks experiencing a seasonal
resource, or when they have an emergency. The central bank, it should be that
its loans do not become a permanent source of funds. Upon receipt of such
loans, commercial banks provide collateral in the form of various Treasury
securities, obligations of federal and local authorities, short-term commercial
paper.
Accounting
for bankers’ acceptances.
Banker’s acceptance – this time draft or bill of exchange, exhibited the
exporter or importer to the bank, has agreed to accept. Bankers’ acceptances
are used to finance foreign trade deals. Commercial bank can discount the Fed
acceptances and thus obtain a loan for them. Deemed acceptable for rediscount
acceptances up to 6 months of export-import transactions or trade transactions
within the country.
Commercial banks to
increase their own capital and, consequently, of banking resources may issue
capital notes and bonds. Notes and bonds are issued mainly large banks. The
launch of these types of bank debt increases, on the one hand, the bank’s
capital, on the other – its resources.
The measurement and evaluation
The measurement and
evaluation of investment performance is the last step in the investment
management process. Actually, it is misleading to say that it is the last step
since the investment management process is an ongoing process. This step
involves measuring the performance of the portfolio and then evaluating that
performance relative to some benchmark.
Although a portfolio manager may have performed better than a benchmark, this does not necessarily mean that the portfolio manager satisfied the client’s investment objective. For example, suppose that a financial institution established as its investment objective the maximization of portfolio return and allocated 75% of its funds to common stock and the balance to bonds. Suppose further that the manager responsible for the common stock portfolio realized a 1-year return that was 150 basis points greater than the benchmark. Assuming that the risk of the portfolio was similar to that of the benchmark, it would appear that the manager outperformed the benchmark. However, sup- pose that in spite of this performance, the financial institution cannot meet its liabilities. Then the failure was in establishing the investment objectives and setting policy, not the failure of the manager. The dividing line between currency economics and long-term valuation analysis is somewhat blurred. There is a difference however and it concerns the time span involved in one’s analysis. The aim of currency economics is to look at the parts of the economy that affect and are affected by the exchange rate, such as the balance of payments and infkation differentials, in order to give an idea about that exchange rate’s current valuation and direction. Long-term valuation models, such as those that focus on REER or FEER, are trying to give a multi-month or more likely a multi-year view of exchange rate valuation. In line with this, the main exchange rate models that focus on long-term valuation are the following:
Although a portfolio manager may have performed better than a benchmark, this does not necessarily mean that the portfolio manager satisfied the client’s investment objective. For example, suppose that a financial institution established as its investment objective the maximization of portfolio return and allocated 75% of its funds to common stock and the balance to bonds. Suppose further that the manager responsible for the common stock portfolio realized a 1-year return that was 150 basis points greater than the benchmark. Assuming that the risk of the portfolio was similar to that of the benchmark, it would appear that the manager outperformed the benchmark. However, sup- pose that in spite of this performance, the financial institution cannot meet its liabilities. Then the failure was in establishing the investment objectives and setting policy, not the failure of the manager. The dividing line between currency economics and long-term valuation analysis is somewhat blurred. There is a difference however and it concerns the time span involved in one’s analysis. The aim of currency economics is to look at the parts of the economy that affect and are affected by the exchange rate, such as the balance of payments and infkation differentials, in order to give an idea about that exchange rate’s current valuation and direction. Long-term valuation models, such as those that focus on REER or FEER, are trying to give a multi-month or more likely a multi-year view of exchange rate valuation. In line with this, the main exchange rate models that focus on long-term valuation are the following:
- Purchasing Power Parity
- The Monetary Approach
- The Interest Rate Approach
- The Balance of Payments Approach
- The Portfolio Balance Approach
Most of these
models focus on the relative price of an asset or good which should over time
cause an exchange rate adjustment to restore “equilibrium”.
Loans to
small companies terrify management at many larger banks and in many countries a
small number of banks tend to specialize in lending to these segments:
They are
sufficiently large individually to require personal attention. This is not the
case with retail loans where little or no attempt is made to take account of
changing borrower circumstances. They are made to companies operating in many
diverse manufacturing and service businesses. This means that they are not readily
amenable to statistical analysis nor does the bank have the in-house expertise
to assess prospects for all these sectors. They are sufficiently large
collectively that a high level of losses on loans made to companies in this
segment would have a material impact on a bank’s financial position. As a
group, SMEs are hit disproportionately hard by economic downturns. This can be
seen by the massive increase in failures of companies in this segment as
reported by bankruptcy figures through recessions.They are sufficiently small
that they fall outside the scope of rating agencies’ coverage.
Their business risks are not well diversified and losing one major customer may be sufficient to cause an otherwise healthy company to fail.Collateral values often depend on the company operating as a going concern.
In most instances a single bank is the major financial creditor. There can be safety in numbers, at least for credit officers, where the borrower has defaulted.
Their business risks are not well diversified and losing one major customer may be sufficient to cause an otherwise healthy company to fail.Collateral values often depend on the company operating as a going concern.
In most instances a single bank is the major financial creditor. There can be safety in numbers, at least for credit officers, where the borrower has defaulted.
A liquidity crisis
A liquidity crisis occurs whenever a firm is unable to pay its bills on
time or lacks sufficient cash to expand inventory and production or violates
some term of an agreement by letting some of its financial ratios exceed
limits. It is the financial manager's job to ensure that this never happens.
But it happens and all interests involved start to scramble to protect their
positions.
In financial
economics, liquidity is a catch-all term that may refer to several
different yet closely related concepts. Among other things, it may refer to Asset
Market liquidity
(the ease with which an asset can be converted into a liquid medium e.g. cash);
Funding liquidity (the ease with which borrowers can obtain external
funding) Balance Sheet or Accounting liquidity (the health of an
institution’s balance sheet measured in terms of its cash-like
assets). Additionally, some economists define a market to be liquid if it can
absorb liquidity - trades (sale of securities
by investors
to meet sudden needs for cash) without large changes in price. Liquidity
Crisis refers to drying up of liquidity, which could reflect a fall
in asset prices below their long run fundamental price; or deterioration in
external financing conditions; or a reduction in the number of market
participants or simply difficulty in trading assets.[1]
How to Respond to a Liquidity Crisis
Once
a company finds itself struggling to meet its short-term obligations, it needs
to urgently access sources
of
cash, both internal and external. The following five-step approach covers the
key elements of any
response:
1.
Tackle the Root of the Crisis
Normally,
a liquidity crisis is only the last symptom of pre-existing root issues such as
strategic or profitabilitycrises (for example, losing one key customer
contract, misalignment of product portfolio and market, acompany overstretching
itself by entering too many markets). A liquidity crisis needs to be addressed
right
away,
but ignoring the crisis’ root causes will merely postpone the next liquidity
crisis. In these times ofurgency, the support of external advisers can bring
highly needed extra resources, experience of crisismanagement, and an
independent perspective.
2.
Be Honest
It
is essential that a company is honest about its current situation, and creates
a climate of transparencyIt must comply with any regulatory requirements to
inform the market, which can be applicable to listedcompanies. A CFO only has
one chance to put things right with the banks:
•
Give an honest assessment of the situation;
•
Communicate appropriate information to all stakeholders; banks, shareholders,
employees, suppliers,credit insurers, etc. so as not to mislead, or make
fraudulent misrepresentations. Be sure to present
an
accurate picture of the current situation; account for all received bills (from
experience, purchaseledgers do not include all received invoices, with many
invoices hidden in staff drawers).
3.
Gain or regain trust
Regaining
the trust of banks, shareholders, and other stakeholders is a prerequisite to
maintaining, or raisingexternal funding. This requires communicating robust and
realistic plans, delivering on these plans andbuilding relationships.
4.
Harvest Cash
There
are three main ways to improve cash position:
1.
Collect and control existing cash2. Reduce working capital3. Restructure the
balance sheet
5.
Manage Cash Sustainability
Finally,
a company needs to ensure a sustainable liquidity position. As mentioned above,
strategic andoperational root causes for the last crisis must be understood and
tackled to avoid reoccurrences of liquiditycrises; then companies can implement
the following techniques to keep control of liquidity:
Asset
and liability management-In banking, asset
and liability management is the practice of managing risks that arise due to
mismatches between the assets and liabilities (debts and assets) of the bank.
This can also be seen in insurance.Banks face several risks such as the liquidity
risk, interest rate risk, credit risk
and operational risk. Asset Liability management (ALM)
is a strategic management tool to manage interest
rate risk and liquidity risk faced by banks, other financial
services companies and corporations. Banks manage the risks of Asset liability mismatch by matching the assets and liabilities
according to the maturity pattern or the matching the duration, by hedging and
by securitization.Techniques
of ALM have also evolved. The growth of OTC derivatives
markets have facilitated a variety of hedging strategies. A significant
development has been securitization,
which allows firms to directly address asset-liability risk by removing assets
or liabilities from their balance sheets. This not only reduces asset-liability
risk; it also frees up the balance sheet for new business.The scope of ALM
activities has widened. Today, ALM departments are addressing (non-trading)
foreign exchange risks and other risks. Also, ALM has extended to non-financial
firms. Corporations have adopted techniques of ALM to address interest-rate
exposures, liquidity risk and foreign exchange risk. They are using related
techniques to address commodities risks. often presented as ALM.
Asset
and liability management imp
Banks
are a vital part of the global economy, and the essence of banking is
asset-liability management (ALM). This book is a comprehensive treatment of an
important financial market discipline. A reference text for all those involved
in banking and the debt capital markets, it describes the techniques, products
and art of ALM. Subjects covered include bank capital, money market trading,
risk management, regulatory capital and yield curve analysis.
- liquidity, gap and funding risk management
- hedging using interest-rate derivatives and credit derivatives
- impact of Basel II
- securitisation and balance sheet management
- structured finance products including asset-backed commercial paper, mortgage-backed securities, collateralised debt obligations and structured investment vehicles, and their role in ALM
- treasury operations and group transfer pricing.
Techniques determin for ALM: ---*
Maturity-Gap Analysis * Duration-Gap
Analysis *Cashflow-Matching
1. Maturity Gap-Analysis -The technique
of maturity gap analysis
is based on a general
interest rate dependency of
assets and liabilities. Assets
and liabilities are classified according
to the term of
fixed interest. This
is the period until
the interest rate
on a nominal balance sheet item
is reset or adjusted in
line with market rates. The
gap is usually defined
with regard to a
maturity segment or gapping period (GP).
We define GAP = ISA
- ISL, 2.Duration-Gap Analysis- Where the
maturity-gap analysis is directed
to interest rate
income, the duration-gap analysis focuses on the
present value of
interest rate payments.
The duration of
an asset or
liability provides a measure for
the sensitivity of its
present value to changes in interest
rates. 3 Cashflow
Matching -The cashflow matching
approach may be regarded as an optimized maturity
gap analysis. The approach
aims at minimizing maturity
differences between asset and
liability cashflows. As
suchit is a normative approach, where the
gap analysis is only
descriptive. However, there are differences in the
degree of matching implied by
this approach. It has
become more or less customary to
distinguish between: exact
cashflow matching, and dedication.
CAMELS ratings
The six factors
examined are as follows:
C - Capital adequacy A - Asset quality M - Management quality E - Earnings
L – Liquidity S - Sensitivity to Market Risk
Bank supervisory authorities assign each bank a score on a scale of one (best) to five (worst) for each factor. If a bank has an average score less than two it is considered to be a high-quality institution, while banks with scores greater than three are considered to be less-than-satisfactory establishments. The system helps the supervisory authority identify banks that are in need of attention.
C - Capital adequacy A - Asset quality M - Management quality E - Earnings
L – Liquidity S - Sensitivity to Market Risk
Bank supervisory authorities assign each bank a score on a scale of one (best) to five (worst) for each factor. If a bank has an average score less than two it is considered to be a high-quality institution, while banks with scores greater than three are considered to be less-than-satisfactory establishments. The system helps the supervisory authority identify banks that are in need of attention.
*The purpose of CAMELS ratings is to determine a bank’s overall condition and
to identify its strengths and weaknesses:1Financial 2 Operational 3Managerial
*Rating System
Each
bank is assigned a uniform composite rating based on six elements. The system
provides a general framework for evaluatingthe banks.It is a standardized
method which allows the assessment of the quality of banks according to
standard criteria providing a meaningful rating.
**Each
element is assigned a numerical rating based on five key
components:
1 Strong performance, sound management, no
cause for supervisory concern
2
Fundamentally sound, compliance with regulations, stable, limited supervisory
needs
3 Weaknesses in one or more components,
unsatisfactory practices, weak performance but limited concern for failure
4 Serious financial and managerial
deficiencies and unsound practices. Need close supervision and remedial action
5 Extremely unsafe practices and conditions,
deficiencies beyond management control. Failure is highly probable and outside
financial assistance needed
*Capital is rated based on the following
considerations:
Nature and volume of problem assets in
relation to total capital and adequacy of LLR
and
other reserves Balance sheet structure including off balance sheet items,
market and concentration risk-
1Nature of business activities and risks to
the bank2Asset and capital growth experience and prospects 3Earnings
performance and distribution of dividends4 Capital requirements and compliance
with regulatory requirements5 Access to capital markets and sources of capital
6Ability of management to deal with above factors
Capital
is rated based on the following
considerations:
z
Nature and volume of problem assets in relation to total capital and adequacy
of LLR
and
other reserves
z
Balance sheet structure including off balance sheet items, market and
concentration
risk
z
Nature of business activities and risks to the bank
z
Asset and capital growth experience and prospects
z
Earnings performance and distribution of dividends
z
Capital requirements and compliance with regulatory requirements
z
Access to capital markets and sources of capital
z
Ability of management to deal with above factors
Asset
quality is based on the following
considerations:
1.
Volume of problem of all assets 2lume of overdue or rescheduled loans
3.bility
of management to administer all the assets of the bank and to collect problem
loansz
Large concentrations of loans and insiders loans, diversification of
investmentsz Loan portfolio management, written policies, procedures internal
control, Management Information Systemz Loan Loss Reserves in relation to
problem credits and other assetsz Growth of loans volume in relation to the
bank’s capacity
Management is the most important element for a successful
operation
of a bank. Rating is based on the following factors:
z
Quality of the monitoring and support of the activities by the board and
management
and
their ability to understand and respond to the risks associated with these
activities
in
the present environment and to plan for the future
z
Financial performance of the bank with regards to the other CAMELS ratings
z
Development and implementation of written policies, procedures, MIS, risk
monitoring
system,
reporting, safeguarding of documents, contingency plan and compliance with
laws
and regulations controlled by a compliance officer
z
Availability of internal and external audit function
z
Concentration or delegation of authority
z
Compensations policies, job descriptions
z
Response to CBI concerns and recommendations
z
Overall performance of the bank and its risk profile
Earnings are rated according to the following factors:
z
Sufficient earnings to cover potential losses, provide adequate capital and pay
reasonable
dividends
z
Composition of net income. Volume and stability of the components
z
Level of expenses in relation to operations
z
Reliance on extraordinary items, securities transactions, high risk activities
z
Non traditional or operational sources
z
Adequacy of budgeting, forecasting, control MIS of income and expenses
z
Adequacy of provisions
z
Earnings exposure to market risks, such as interest rate variations, foreign
exchange
fluctuations
and price risk
Liquidity is rated based on the following factors:
z
Sources and volume of liquid funds available to meet short term obligations
z
Volatility of deposits and loan demand
z
Interest rates and maturities of assets and liabilities
z
Access to money market and other sources of funds
z
Diversification of funding sources
z
Reliance on inter-bank market for short term funding
z
Management ability to plan, control and measure liquidity process. MIS.
z
Contingency plan
Sensivity
and Market risk is based primarily on
the following evaluation factors:
z
Sensitivity to adverse changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates,
commodity
prices,
fixed assets
—
Nature of the operations of the bank
—
Trends in the foreign currencies exposure
—
Changes in the value of the fixed assets of the bank
—
Importance of real estate assets resulting from loans write off
z
Ability of management to identify, measure and control the market risks given
the
bank
exposure to these risks
Short-term subordinated debt covering
market it May be unsecured,
subordinated and fully paid up;• have an original maturity of at least two
years;• not be repayable before the agreed repayment date unless the
supervisory authority agrees;• be subject to a lock-in clause which stipulates
that neither interest nor principal may be paid
if such payment means that the bank falls below or remains below its
minimum capital requirement.
Credit risk
The
risk of loss of principal or loss of a financial reward stemming from a
borrower's failure to repay a loan or otherwise meet a contractual obligation.
Credit risk arises whenever a borrower is expecting to use future cash flows to
pay a current debt. Investors are compensated for assuming credit risk by way
of interest payments from the borrower or issuer of a debt obligation.Credit
risk is closely tied to the potential return of an investment, the most notable
being that the yields on bonds correlate strongly to their perceived credit
risk. Credit / default risk is a chance or probability that a counterparty
cannot fulfil the agreed obligation, including a chance that the counterparty’s
credit risk will be down graded,which may affect earnings and capital fund of
financial institutions (FIs). Credit risk is very important as it involves
credit extension, which is a major transaction of financial institutionsboth
credits that are assets and contingent liabilities of the financial
institutions.
Credit risk mang
The
process of identification, analysis and either acceptance or mitigation of
uncertainty in investment decision-making. Essentially, risk management
occurs anytime an investor or fund manager analyzes and attempts to quantify
the potential for losses in an investment and then takes the appropriate action
(or inaction) given their investment objectives and risk tolerance. Inadequate
risk management can result in severe consequences for companies as well as
individuals. For example, the recession that began in 2008 was largely
caused by the loose credit risk management of financial firms.
Principal
mang
1.
While financial institutions have faced difficulties over the years for a
multitude of reasons, the major cause of serious banking problems continues to
be directly related to lax credit standards for borrowers and counterparties,
poor portfolio risk management, or a lack of attention to changes in economic
or other circumstances that can lead to a deterioration in the credit standing
of a bank's counterparties.
2. Credit risk is
most simply defined as the potential that a bank borrower or counterparty will
fail to meet its obligations in accordance with agreed terms. The goal of
credit risk management is to maximise a bank's risk-adjusted rate of return by
maintaining credit risk exposure within acceptable parameters. Banks need to
manage the credit risk inherent in the entire portfolio as well as the risk in
individual credits or transactions..
3. For most banks,
loans are the largest and most obvious source of credit risk; however, other
sources of credit risk exist throughout the activities of a bank, including in
the banking book and in the trading book, and both on and off the balance
sheet. Banks are increasingly facing credit risk (or counterparty risk) in
various financial instruments other than loans, including acceptances,
interbank transactions, trade financing, foreign exchange transactions,
financial futures, swaps, bonds, equities, options, and in the extension of
commitments and guarantees, and the settlement of transactions.
4. Since exposure
to credit risk continues to be the leading source of problems in banks
world-wide, banks and their supervisors should be able to draw useful lessons
from past experiences. Banks should now have a keen awareness of the need to
identify, measure, monitor and control credit risk as well as to determine that
they hold adequate capital against these risks and that they are adequately
compensated for risks incurred
5. The sound
practices set out in this document specifically address the following areas:
(i) establishing an appropriate credit risk environment; (ii) operating under a
sound credit-granting process; (iii) maintaining an appropriate credit
administration, measurement and monitoring process; and (iv) ensuring adequate
controls over credit risk. Although specific credit risk management practices
may differ among banks depending upon the nature and complexity of their credit
activities, a comprehensive credit risk management program will address these
four areas.
6. While the exact
approach chosen by individual supervisors will depend on a host of factors,
including their on-site and off-site supervisory techniques and the degree to
which external auditors are also used in the supervisory function, all members
of the Basel Committee agree that the principles set out in this paper should
be used in evaluating a bank's credit risk management system.
7. The Committee stipulates
in Sections II through VI of the paper, principles for banking supervisory
authorities to apply in assessing bank's credit risk management systems. In
addition, the appendix provides an overview of credit problems commonly seen by
supervisors.
8. A further
particular instance of credit risk relates to the process of settling financial
transactions. If one side of a transaction is settled but the other fails, a
loss may be incurred that is equal to the principal amount of the transaction.
Even if one party is simply late in settling, then the other party may incur a
loss relating to missed investment opportunities. Settlement risk (i.e. the
risk that the completion or settlement of a financial transaction will fail to
take place as expected) thus includes elements of liquidity, market,
operational and reputational risk as well as credit risk.
Liquidity Risk
The
concept of liquidity is increasingly important in managing financial risk. It
is driven by; the structure and depth of markets; volatility of market
prices/rates; the presence of traders willing to make markets and commit
capital to support trading; and, trading / leverage strategies deployed. It has historically been thought of as associated
with funding, however, it can be separated into two distinct risk types – Funding Liquidity Risk
and Trading Liquidity Risk. In September 2008 the BIS released a detailed
guidance document on liquidity management – “Principles for Sound
Liquidity
Risk Management and Supervision4”. The document provides a number of guidance
principles around; governance; measurement and management; public disclosure;
and, the role of supervisors. It is the most comprehensive
regulatory/supervisory response on the subject to date.
Liquidity Management
The main liquidity concern of the ALM unit is
the funding liquidity risk embedded in the balance sheet. The funding of long term mortgages and
other securitised assets with short term liabilities (the maturity transformation process), has
moved to centre stage with the contagion effect of the sub-prime debacle. Both industry and
regulators failed to recognise the importance of funding and liquidity as contributors to the crisis and
the dependence on short term funding created intrinsic flaws in the business model. Banks must assess
the buoyancy of funding and liquidity sources
through
the ALM process. . Like all areas of
risk management, it is necessary to put a workable framework in place to manage
liquidity risk. It needs to look at two aspects: 1) Managing liquidity under
the business as usual
scenario,
and 2) Managing liquidity under stress conditions. It also needs to include a
number of liquidity measurement tools and establish limits against them At the
governance level, boards need to recognise liquidity risk as the ultimate
killer. This means a board needs to
clearly articulate the risk tolerance of the organization and subject the
balance
sheet
to regular scrutiny. Guiding principles need
to be included as part of this process. The
following
5 principles are valuable:
1.
Diversify sources and term of funding – concentration and contagion were
the killers in the
recent
crisis. 2. Identify, measure, monitor
and control – it is still surprising
that many banks do not fully
understand
the composition of their balance sheet to a sufficient level of detail to allow
for
management
of the risks. 3. Understand the
interaction between liquidity and other risks – e.g. basis risk – the flow on
impact
of an event in one area can be devastating to others.
4. Establish both tactical and strategic
liquidity management platforms – keep a focus on both
the
forest and the trees.
5.Establish
detailed contingency plans and stress test under multiple scenarios regularly
Funding Liquidity Risk
This
refers of course to the ability to meet funding obligations by either financing
through sale of assets or by borrowing.
Perhaps the most poignant example is the recent crisis-driven drying up of access to debt securities markets globally
which forced governments in most jurisdictions to provide massive ‘window’
facilities to market participants. At the strategic level, most banks will manage funding liquidity risk through the ALM
process and this is looked at in the sections on ALM below. In many smaller banks, however, it
can be the responsibility of the trading department that also has day to day
responsibility for operationalising the strategy.
Working Capital
The
amount of working capital
a company determines it must maintain
in order to continue
to meet its costs and expenses. The working
capital
requirement will be different for each company, depending upon many factors such as how
frequently the company receives earnings and how
high their expenses are. - Working Capital is the amount of Capital that
a Business has available to meet the day-to-day cash requirements of its
operations Working Capital is the
difference between resources in cash or readily convertible into cash (Current
Assets) and organizational commitments for which cash will soon be required .
It refers to the amount of Current Assets that exceeds Current Liabilities
.Working Capital refers to that part of the firm’s Capital, which is required
for Financing Short-Term or Current Assets such as Cash, Marketable Securities,
Factors Determining Working Capital Requirements Part
(1) Availability of
Credit: The amount of credit that a firm can obtain, as also the length of the
credit period significantly affects the working capital requirement. The
greater the prospects of getting credit, the smaller will be its requirement of
working capital because it can easily purchase raw materials and other
requirements on credit.
(2) Growth and Expansion: The working capital
requirements increase with growth and expansion of business. Hence planning of
the working capital requirements and its procurement must go hand in hand with
the planning of the growth and expansion of the firm. The implementation of the
production plan that aims at the growth or expansion of the unit necessitates
more of fixed capital and working capital both.
(3) Profit and its Distribution: The net
profit of a firm is a good index of the resources available to it to meet its
capital requirements. But, from the viewpoint of working capital requirement,
it is the profit in the form of cash which is important, and not the net
profit. The profit available in the form of cash is called cash profit and it
can be assessed by adding or deducting non-cash items from the net profit of
the firm. The larger the amount of cash profit, the greater will be the
possibility of acquiring working capital.
(4) Price Level Fluctuations: A general
statement may be made that with price rise, a firm will require more funds to purchase
its current assets. In other words, the requirements of working capital will
increase with the rise in prices. But all firms may not be affected equally.
The prices of all current assets never go up to the same extent. Price of some
current assets rise less rapidly than those of the others. Hence for the firms
which use such current assets, the working capital need will increase by a
smaller amount. Besides, if it is possible to pass on the burden of high prices
of raw materials to the customers by raising the prices of final product, then
also there will be no increase in working capital requirements.
(5) Operating
Efficiency: If a firm is efficient, it can use its resources economically, and
thereby it can reduce cost and earn more profit. Thus, the working capital
requirement can be reduced by more efficient use of the current assets.
Operational Risk
Under
the Basel II Accord, operational risk is
defined as “...the risk of loss
resulting from inadequate processes,
people and systems or from external events.” The Accord also recognises however that the term “operational risk” can
include different meanings, and therefore permits banks to use their own definitions provided
the key elements of the Basel II
definition are included. While banks have always engaged in operational risk
management, the Basel II related
rules
introduce new dimensions to this practice in the form of explicit capital
requirements and corresponding changes in supervisory oversight. The management
of operational risk requires systems capable of identifying, recording and
quantifying
operational failures that may cause financial loss. The systems are essentially
tracking processes that monitor the behaviour and performance of existing
systems and processes. The essential elements include 1) the ability to track and monitor performances of specified
operational processes and systems, 2) maintenance of databases of operational
loss experience history, and 3) capacity to provide exception reporting or
initiate actions to enable intervention to reduce operational risks.
Interest rate risk: Interest risk is the change in prices of bonds that
could occur as a result of change: n interest rates. It also considers change
in impact on interest income due to changes in the rate of interest. In other
words, price as well as rein-vestment risks require focus. In so far as the
terms for which interest rates were fixed
on deposits differed from those for which they fixed on assets, banks incurred interest rate risk i.e., they stood
to make gains or losses with every
change
in the level of interest rates. As long
as changes in rates were predictable both in magnitude and in timing over
the
business cycle, interest rate risk was not seen as too serious, but as rates of
interest became more volatile, there was felt need for explicit means of
monitoring and controlling interest
gaps. In most OECD countries (Harrington, 1987), the situation was no different
from that which prevailed in domestic banking. The term to maturity of a bond
provides clues to the fluctuations in the price of the bond since it is fairly well-known that
longer maturity bonds have greater
fluctuations
for a given change in the interest rates compared to shorter maturity bonds. In other words commercial banks, which
are holding large proportions of longer
maturity bonds, will face more price reduction when the interest rates go up. Therefore, the banking industry has
substantially more issues associ ated with
interest rate risk, which is due to circumstances outside its control. This poses extra challenges to the banking sector
and to that extent, they have to adopt innovative
and sophisticated techniques to meet some of these challenges. There are
certain measures available to Measure
interest rate risk. These include:
. 1Maturity: Since it takes into account only the timing
of the final principal payment, maturity is considered as an approximate
measure of risk and in a sense does not quantify risk. Longer maturity bonds
are generally subject to
Reputational
risk, often called reputation risk,
is a type of risk related to the trustworthiness of business. Damage to a
firm's reputation can result in lost revenue or destruction of shareholder
value, even if the company is not found guilty of a crime. Reputational
risk can be a matter of corporate trust, but serves also as a tool in crisis
prevention.[1]This
type of risk can be informational in nature or even financial. Extreme cases
may even lead to bankruptcy (as in the case of Arthur
Andersen). Recent examples of companies include: Toyota, Goldman
Sachs, Oracle Corporation and BP. The reputational risk
may not always be the company's fault as per the case of the Tylenol cyanide
panic in 1982.[. Understand
the value of your entity’s reputation.
Management Reputational risk -1Treat reputation holistically. 2Understand
interrelationships within the business.3Identify and prioritise the main causes
of reputational risk.Communicate these causes to key management. 4Have a crisis
plan when all else fails.
.
Call
Money loaned by a bank that must be repaid on demand. Unlike a term loan,
which has a set maturity and payment schedule, call money does not have to
follow a fixed schedule. Brokerages use call money as a short-term source of
funding to cover margin accounts or the purchase of securities. The funds can
be obtained quickly.
The
interest rate on a type of short-term loan that banks give to brokers who in
turn lend the money to investors to fund margin accounts. For both brokers and
investors, this type of loan does not have a set repayment schedule and must be
repaid on demand.
A
market that consists of the borrowing of money by brokers and dealers for the
purpose of meeting their credit needs.
Generally this money is used to either cover their customersâ?? margin accounts or finance their own inventory of securities. Along with day-to-day loans, call money loans play a significant role in interbank money dealings and between banks and money market dealers. The term â??call moneyâ?? alone usually refers to either secured or unsecured callable loans made by banks to money market dealers. Generally these loans are made on a short term basis.
Generally this money is used to either cover their customersâ?? margin accounts or finance their own inventory of securities. Along with day-to-day loans, call money loans play a significant role in interbank money dealings and between banks and money market dealers. The term â??call moneyâ?? alone usually refers to either secured or unsecured callable loans made by banks to money market dealers. Generally these loans are made on a short term basis.
A capital
market is a market for securities (debt or equity), where business enterprises (companies)
and governments
can raise long-term funds. It is defined as a market in which money is provided
for periods longer than a year,[1][dead link] as the raising of
short-term funds takes place on other markets (e.g., the money
market). The capital market includes the stock
market (equity securities) and the bond market
(debt). Financial regulators, such as the UK's Financial Services Authority (FSA) or
the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), oversee the capital markets in their designated
jurisdictions to ensure that investors are protected against fraud, among other
duties.Capital markets may be classified as primary
markets and secondary markets. In primary markets, new stock
or bond issues are sold to investors via a mechanism known as underwriting.
In the secondary markets, existing securities are sold and bought among
investors or traders, usually on a securities exchange, over-the-counter, or elsewhere.A capital
market is simply any market where a government or a company (usually a
corporation) can raise money (capital) to fund their operations and long term
investment. Selling bonds and selling stock are two ways to generate capital,
thus bond
markets and stock
markets (such as the Dow Jones) are considered capital marketsStock values
reflect investor reactions to government policy as well. If the government
adopts policies that investors believe will hurt the economy and company profits, the market
declines; if investors believe policies will help the economy, the market
rises. Critics have sometimes suggested that American investors focus too much
on short-term profits; often, these analysts say, companies or policy-makers
are discouraged from taking steps that will prove beneficial in the long run because
they may require short-term adjustments that will depress stock prices. Because
the market reflects the sum of millions of decisions by millions of investors,
there is no good way to test this theory.
Money market
A segment of the financial market in which financial instruments with
high liquidity and very short maturities are traded. The money market is
used by participants as a means for borrowing and lending in the short
term, from several days to just under a year. Money market securities consist
of negotiable certificates of deposit (CDs), bankers acceptances, U.S. Treasury
bills, commercial paper, municipal notes, federal funds and repurchase
agreements. Compare the top money market accounts,
money market
rates and savings account rates with our money
markets comparison chart. Sign up for our newsletter, and we'll keep you
informed of the high yield money market rates, high interest savings account rates, and bank bonuses. With
an online money market account, banks can pay higher money market rates
because of lower costs.
Securitization
Securitization in a
broad sense - is a process which
converts a illiquid financial asset into
liquid asset through a transaction process. Securitization is the issuance of
marketable securities backed not by the expected capacity to repay of a private
corporation or public sector entity but by the expected future cash flows from
specific assets.” .Securitization is a pooling of homogeneous, cash flow
producing illiquid financial assets and issuing claims on those identifiable
assets in the form of multiple classes of marketable securities
Why
Securitization-The higher yield
associated with these securities attracts investors who are willing to bear
specific credit, prepayment and liquidity risk associated with the cash flows
from the pool of assets. The fundamental principle in securitisation is
specific identification of risks and allocation of the same to various parties
who are best able to manage those risks.
Benefits
to Banks /FIs
To
improve capital adequacy ratio
(In order to meet regularly capital requirement the
bank should,
_ Securities the good assets
- Profit from origination and servicing.
Thus
regulatory costs and rigidities in norms create an incentive for banks to
shrink their balance sheets by securitizing loans.)
•
Reduces risk based
capital requirements.
•
Increases
liquidity
•
Reduces exposure
to credit concentrations
•
Increases lending
capacity
•
Reduces under
performing assets
•
Improves return on
capital and share holder value
•
Provides access to
more favourable capital markets funding rates
•
Diversified funding options
•
Allows for better
asset liability managements
•
Preserves customer relations
Securitization
Process and Participants
The
mortgage loan securitization process of creating a trust to acquire mortgages
and issue pass-through certificates to investors typically involves seven key
participants. These participants are the seller, underwriter, trustee,
servicer, rating agency, accountant, and legal counsel. The seller is the owner
of the mortgage loans sold to the trust and the ultimate ben- eficiary of the
proceeds from the sale of the certificates to investors. The seller may pro-
vide
some form of guarantee or credit support to enhance the value of the bonds. The
seller will also usually provide certain representations and warranties related
to the mort- gage collateral. The underwriter receives individual mortgage loan
information, analyzes and struc- tures the portfolio into multiple classes of
certificates of varying maturities and interest rates, and underwrites (purchases)
the securities from the seller. The underwriter then
resells
the certificates to investors. The trustee represents the interests of the
certificate holders and acts as administra-
tor
of the trust. The primary role of the trustee is to compute the amount of
monthly distributions payable to the investors and make appropriate
distributions. Each month, an account statement is prepared by the trustee that
summarizes the cash received by the trust and explains the calculation of the
amounts paid to the investors of each class of securities. The trustee is
usually responsible for the preparation of the trust’s income tax return and
the related informational tax filings. The trustee for publicly rated
securities must provide backup servicing for the securitized loans in case the
appointed servicer is unable to service the loans. The trustee must also make
advances for delinquent mort- gage payments if the primary servicer fails to do
so. For this reason, the trustee must have an unsecured debt or deposit rating
of no more than one full rating level below that of the securities issue (that
is, if the RTC issues double A rated securities [AA], the trustee must have an
unsecured debt or deposit rating of single A [A]). The servicer performs the
traditional mortgage loan servicing functions of collecting and accounting for
borrower’s payments and resolving delinquent loans. The servicer prepares
special reports for the trustee and forwards the monthly mortgage collection
Loan sale-A loan sale is a sale, often by a bank, under contract of all or part of the cash stream from a specific loan, thereby removing the loan from the bank's balance sheet.
Often sub prime
loans from failed banks in the United States are sold by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC) in an online auction format through companies such as The
Debt Exchange, Mission Capital Advisors, Eastdil Secured,
Garnet and First Financial, all of which are listed on the FDIC's website under
Asset Sales and the Carlton Group (under Carlton Exchange). Performing loans
are also sold between financial institutions. Mandel & Company is an
example of a leading financial services firm that arranges performing loan
sales. Bank lending traditionally involves the extension of credit that is held
by the originating bank until maturity.
Loan sales allow banks to deviate from this pattern by transferring
loans in part or in their entirety from their own books to those of another
institution. This paper uses a new
methodology to test the validity of two hypotheses regarding banks’ motivations
for selling and buying loans: (1) the comparative advantage hypothesis, that
banks with a comparative advantage in originating loans sell and those with a
comparative advantage in funding loans buy, and (2) the diversification
hypothesis, that banks lacking the ability to diversify internally use loan
sales and purchases to achieve diversification.
A third hypothesis -- that reputational barriers can limit access to the
secondary market -- is considered as well, with particular attention paid to
the importance of affiliate relationships in explaining secondary market
activity. Together, the evidence
relating to these three hypotheses helps clarify the benefits of an active
secondary loan market. It also generates
predictions regarding the future of that market in a world of rapid
consolidation and disappearing barriers to geographical expansion.With
institutional investors looking increasingly to loan sales as an essential tool
in commercial mortgage portfolio management,
The rationale for loan sales is quite broad
and includes:
- the significant trading profit available to seasoned loans given current interest rate and liquidity characteristics of the market
- mitigation of mortgage portfolio concentration by asset class, geography, sponsorship, term structure, or credit exposure
- proactive watch list management
- high NPV alternative to foreclosure of defaulted loans
Factoring
is a financial transaction whereby a business job
sells its accounts receivable (i.e., invoices) to a
third party (called a factor) at a discount. In "advance"
factoring, the factor provides financing to the seller of the accounts in the
form of a cash "advance," often 70-85% of the purchase price of the
accounts, with the balance of the purchase price being paid, net of the
factor's discount fee (commission) and other charges, upon collection. In
"maturity" factoring, the factor makes no advance on the purchased
accounts; rather, the purchase price is paid on or about the average maturity
date of the accounts being purchased in the batch. Factoring differs from a
bank loan in several ways. The emphasis is on the value of the receivables
(essentially a financial
asset), whereas a bank focuses more on the value of the borrower's total
assets, and often considers, in underwriting the loan, the value attributable
to non-accounts collateral owned by the borrower also, such as inventory,
equipment, and real property,[1][2]
i.e., matters beyond the credit worthiness of the firm's accounts receivables
and of the account debtors (obligors) thereon. Secondly, factoring is not a loan – it is the
purchase of a financial
asset (the receivable). Third, a nonrecourse factor
assumes the "credit risk", that a purchased account will not collect
due solely to the financial inability of account debtor to pay. In the United
States, if the factor does not assume credit risk on the purchased accounts, in
most cases a court will recharacterize the transaction as a secured loan.It is
different from forfaiting in the sense that forfaiting is a
transaction-based operation involving exporters in which the firm sells one of
its transactions,[3]
while factoring is a Financial Transaction that involves the Sale of any
portion of the firm's Receivables.[1][2]
Factoring is a word often misused synonymously with invoice discounting[citation needed] - factoring is
the sale of receivables, whereas invoice discounting is borrowing where the
receivable is used as collateral.[4]
The three parties directly involved are: the one who sells the receivable, the debtor (the account
debtor, or customer of the seller), and the factor. The receivable is essentially a financial asset
associated with the debtor's liability to pay money owed to the
seller (usually for work performed or goods sold). The seller then sells one or
more of its invoices (the receivables) at a discount to the third party, the
specialized financial organization (aka the factor), often, in advance
factoring, to obtain cash. The sale of the receivables essentially transfers
ownership of the receivables to the factor, indicating the factor obtains all
of the rights associated with the receivables.[1][2]
Accordingly, the factor obtains the right to receive the payments made by the
debtor for the invoice amount and, in nonrecourse factoring, must bear the loss
if the account debtor does not pay the invoice amount due solely to his or its
financial inability to pay. Usually, the account debtor is notified of the sale
of the receivable, and the factor bills the debtor and makes all collections;
however, non-notification factoring, where the client (seller) collects the
accounts sold to the factor, as agent of the factor, also occurs. There are
three principal parts to "advance" factoring transaction; a.) the
advance, a percentage of the invoice face value that is paid to the seller at
the time of sale, b.) the reserve, the remainder of the purchase price held
until the payment by the account debtor is made and c.) the discount fee, the
cost associated with the transaction which is deducted from the reserve, along
with other expenses, upon collection, before the reserve is disbursed to the
factor's client. Sometimes the factor charges the seller (the factor's
"client") both a discount fee, for the factor's assumption of credit
risk and other services provided, as well as interest on the factor's advance,
based on how long the advance, often treated as a loan (repaid by set-off
against the factor's purchase obligation, when the account is collected), is
outstanding.[5]
The factor also estimates the amount that may not be collected due to
non-payment, and makes accommodation for this in pricing, when determining the
purchase price to be paid to the seller. The factor's overall profit is the
difference between the price it paid for the invoice and the money received
from the debtor, less the amount lost due to non-payment.[2]
Risks-The most important risks of a factor are:
- Counter party credit risk related to clients and risk covered debtors. Risk covered debtors can be reinsured, which limit the risks of a factor. Trade receivables are a fairly low risk asset due to their short duration.
- External fraud by clients: fake invoicing, mis-directed payments, pre-invoicing, not assigned credit notes, etc. A fraud insurance policy and subjecting the client to audit could limit the risks.
- Legal, compliance and tax risks: large number of applicable laws and regulations in different countries.
- Operational risks, such as contractual disputes.
- Uniform Commercial Code (UCC-1) securing rights to assets.
- IRS liens associated with payroll taxes etc.
- ICT risks: complicated, integrated factoring system, extensive data exchange with client.
Repo
Meaning of repo Rate-A repo or more broadly, a repurchase agreement, is normally a contract through which a seller of securities promises to buy them back at a later date for a mutually agreed price. Overnight repo, term repo, reverse
repo, purchase agreement, buyback, and leaseback are some of the other related terms used in these kinds of
operations. Financial instruments like treasury or government bills, treasury/government or corporate bonds, and stocks/shares are offered as securities in a repurchase agreement. Typically, in this agreement, a prospective seller submits the instruments for cash, with a promise to repurchase them from the buyer at a specified time. The sum being repaid is always greater than the sum received at the time of agreement. The difference amount is termed as repo rate.A repo differs marginally from a loan transaction. While taking a loan, the debtor places the instruments under a lien to the lender. Physical possession of the securities lies with the lender during the tenancy of the loan. When the loan is fully settled, the borrower gets back the ownership of the securities. If the debtor fails to clear the loan, the lender can dispose of the securities to recover the dues. If the sale value of the securities is lesser than the total loan amount, the creditor holds the legal right to recover the balance amount from the debtor.
In the case of a repo, the cash provider can liquidate the securities if the seller defaults in the repurchase of the instruments. However, the repo buyer cannot recover the full amount, if the sale value of the securities is lesser than the cash lent originally. This can happen if the instruments had depreciated in value during the repo agreement period. On the other hand, if the securities had appreciated during that period, the buyer stands to make a fair profit. Thus, a repo transaction carries a definite element of risk. Normally, repos are invariably overcollateralized to reduce the amount of risk involved. Daily market-to-market margining is also resorted to in repo agreements.
Reverse Repo Rate
This is the exact opposite of repo rate. The rate at which RBI borrows money from the banks (or banks lend money to the RBI) is termed the reverse repo rate. The RBI uses this tool when it feels there is too much money floating in the banking system If the reverse repo rate is increased, it means the RBI will borrow money from the bank and offer them a lucrative rate of interest. As a result, banks would prefer to keep
their money with the RBI (which is absolutely risk free) instead of lending it out (this option comes with a certain amount of risk) Consequently, banks would have lesser funds to lend to their customers. This helps stem the flow of excess money into the economy Reverse repo rate signifies the rate at which the central bank absorbs liquidity from the banks, while repo signifies the rate at which liquidity is injected.
Bank Rate This is the rate at which RBI lends money to other banks (or financial institutions .The bank rate signals the central bank’s long-term outlook on interest rates. If the bank rate moves up, long-term interest rates also tend to move up, and vice-versa. Banks make a profit by borrowing at a lower rate and lending the same funds at a higher rate of interest. If the RBI hikes the bank rate (this is currently 6 per cent), the interest that a bank pays for borrowing money (banks borrow money either from each other or from the RBI) increases. It, in turn, hikes its own lending rates to ensure it continues to make a profit.
Liquidity
Analysis Ratios
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
Current Ratio =
|
------------------------
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Quick Assets
|
|
Quick Ratio =
|
----------------------
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Quick Assets = Current Assets
- Inventories
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Net Working Capital
|
|
Net Working Capital Ratio =
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
Net Working Capital = Current
Assets - Current Liabilities
|
Profitability Analysis
Ratios
|
![]() |
|
|
Net Income
|
|
Return on Assets (ROA) =
|
----------------------------------
|
|
|
Average Total Assets
|
|
|
|
Average Total Assets =
(Beginning Total Assets + Ending Total Assets) / 2
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Net Income
|
|
Return on Equity (ROE) =
|
--------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Average Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
Average Stockholders'
Equity
= (Beginning Stockholders' Equity + Ending Stockholders' Equity) / 2 |
|
![]() |
|
|
Net Income
|
|
Return on Common Equity =
|
--------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Average Common Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
Average Common Stockholders'
Equity
= (Beginning Common Stockholders' Equity + Ending Common Stockholders' Equity) / 2 |
|
![]() |
|
|
Net Income
|
|
Profit Margin =
|
-----------------
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Net Income
|
|
Earnings Per Share =
|
---------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Number of Common Shares Outstanding
|
Activity Analysis
Ratios
|
![]() |
|
|
Sales
|
|
Assets Turnover Ratio =
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
Average Total Assets
|
|
|
|
Average Total Assets =
(Beginning Total Assets + Ending Total Assets) / 2
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Sales
|
|
Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio =
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
|
Average Accounts Receivable
|
Average Accounts
Receivable
= (Beginning Accounts Receivable + Ending Accounts Receivable) / 2 |
|
![]() |
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold
|
|
Inventory Turnover Ratio =
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
Average Inventories
|
|
|
|
Average Inventories =
(Beginning Inventories + Ending Inventories) / 2
|
Capital Structure
Analysis Ratios
|
![]() |
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
Debt to Equity Ratio =
|
----------------------------------
|
|
|
Total Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Income Before Interest and Income Tax
Expenses
|
|
Interest Coverage Ratio =
|
-------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
Income Before Interest and
Income Tax Expenses
= Income Before Income Taxes + Interest Expense |
|
Capital Market Analysis
Ratios
|
![]() |
|
|
Market Price of Common Stock Per Share
|
|
Price Earnings Ratio =
|
------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Market Price of Common Stock Per Share
|
|
Market to Book Ratio =
|
-------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Book Value of Equity Per Common Share
|
Book Value of Equity Per
Common Share
= Book Value of Equity for Common Stock / Number of Common Shares |
|
![]() |
|
|
Annual Dividends Per Common Share
|
|
Dividend Yield =
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Market Price of Common Stock Per Share
|
|
|
|
Book Value of Equity Per
Common Share
= Book Value of Equity for Common Stock / Number of Common Shares |
|
![]() |
|
|
Cash Dividends
|
|
Dividend Payout Ratio =
|
--------------------
|
|
|
Net Income
|
ROA = Profit Margin X
Assets Turnover Ratio
|
![]() |
|
|
Net Income
|
Net Income
|
Sales
|
|
ROA =
|
------------------------ =
|
-------------- X
|
------------------------
|
|
|
Average Total Assets
|
Sales
|
Average Total Assets
|
Profit Margin = Net Income /
Sales
Assets Turnover Ratio = Sales / Averages Total Assets |
No comments:
Post a Comment